newmediaraces

 

Martin Lister: New Media and New Technologies

Page history last edited by Marcel 2 yrs ago

Presentationgroup 2:

 

Group members:

Christian

Ahmed

Marcel

Simone

Marion

 

 

Martin Lister: New Media and New Technologies

 

 

1.1 What are new media?

 

  • vague term which is used to mean different things and to mark a break with history, is subdivided into three different senses:(9)
  • 1. the ‘media’ as an institution: on the one hand it refers to ‘communication media’ and the institutions and organisations in which people work (the press, cinema, broadcasting, publishing,…) on the other hand to the cultural and material products of those institutions (the forms and genres of news, road movies,…)
  • ‘the media’ (fully social institution) ↔ ‘new media’ (something far less settled, known and identified) (9f)
  • 2. new media = cause and effect: it evoked different kinds of change (10f)

      -> shift from modernity to postmodernity

      -> intensifying processes of globalisation

      -> post-industrial information age replaces the industrial age of manufacturing

      -> decentring of established and centralised geo-political orders

  • 3. new= better, social progress through technology (11)
  • many digital new media are reworked and expanded versions of ‘old’ analogue media (e.g. TV) (11f)
  • ‘new media’ actually refers to a wide range of changes in media production, distribution and use (but more than just technological changes, also textual, conventional and cultural) (13)

 

1.2 The Characteristics of New Media: Some Defining Concepts

 

  • Key terms of new media: digitality, interactivity, hypertextuality, dispersal and virtuality (p.13)

 

1.2.1 Digital vs. Analogue

 

  • All input data - in contrast to analogue media - is not converted into another physical object, but decoded and received as screen displays or can be output as hard copy
  • Digital media do not represent a complete break, but are a continuation and extension of traditional analogue media (p. 14-15)
  • Analogue media tend to be fixed (physical objects). Whereas digital media tend towards a permanent state of flux
  • The relationship author/performer/creator and reader/spectator/interpreter become blurred and give way to a reading / writing continuum!  -> disappearance of the signature! (p. 16-17)

 

1.2.2 Interactivity

 

  • I. is an opportunity to manipulate and intervene in media
  • Two types: Ideological interactivity/Instrumental(functional) interactivity
  • under the idea of interaction, new modes of engagement such as playing, experimenting and exploring arise (p. 19-21)
  • Examples for interactivity:

-         hypertexual navigation

-         immersive navigation

-         registrational interactivity

-         interactive communications

  • Problems arising from interactivity:

-         interpretation & definition problems:

how do we define interactive text? (experiences can differ between users)

-         problems for producers: how much control should be giver to the user, how much should be retained? (p. 21-23)

 

         

1.2.3 Hypertext

 

 

  • describes a text which provides a network of links to other texts that are ‘outside, above, beyond’ itself (e.g. Wikipedia articles)
  • characteristics: easy and instantaneous access, instantly accessible links, interventions and manipulations possible, interactivity, jump-link capability, totally beyond the author’s control (23-29)
  •  ‘Cybertextuality’: machine, text and reader/user are all equally implicated in the production of meaning (p. 29f)

 

 

1.2.4 Dispersal

 

  •  new media are dispersed in comparison to mass media, no clear distinction between consumers and producers

      -> consumption: decentralised, individual, not bound to time and place, many input/output connections

      -> production: within everyday life (photos, homepages, word documents,…), distinction between producer and consumer has broken down, breakdown of the professionals category     

      -> participation: from active interpretation to actual production (29-32)

 

 

1.2.5 Virtuality

 

  •  ‘virtual reality’ is applied to several different forms of media and image technologies simultaneously:

-> ‘virtual’ in discussions of the internet and the world wide web; immersive, 3D, and  spectacular technologies; screen -based multimedia and in the transformation and convergence of older media as in digital cinema, video, and computer animation

      -> ‘virtual’ as a feature of post-modern cultures in which so many aspects of everyday

            experience are technologically simulated

  • two reference points concerning to virtual reality:

      -> image environment: immersive, interactive experience       -> product of text: metaphorical ‘places and spaces’ created by or within

 

           communications network (34f)

 

1.2.7 Future Scenarios

 

  • the concept of body seems to become detached from the identity that a person might assume
  • digital simulation of the human body (high resolution)
  • present cultural familiarity with virtual image forms
  • further developments in the realms of computer animation / digital cinema
  • cyber-science fiction (p. 36f)

 

 

 

 

Questions:

 

 

What are new media? What are the constituent parts of new media?

 

What is the difference between old and new media?

 

With what kind of changes are new media associated?

 

What is meant by the term “technological essentialism” and why is it according to Lister a “trap”?

 

What are distinctive features of digital media? What kind of shift(s) took place in the 20th century?

 

 

Can you name the pros and cons of the "digital letter"? What can be said about authorship?

 

By providing a wide range of interactivity, new media are more liberal and offer a greater consumer choice. Discuss this thesis!

 

What does the term interactivity mean?

 

What different kinds of levels are there within interactivity and what do they provide for the users?

 

Hypertext is a term which is widely used but rarely defined, what does it actually mean?

 

What is Bush trying to argue with his “Associate Linkage” in his essay “As We May Think”?

 

What is meant by “jump-link capability”?

 

What does Nelson mean with his “concept of hypermedia”?

 

Why do Bolter and Grusin call “hypermediacy” a crucial term in their theory of media?

 

It is argued that the literary apparatus of knowledge (e.g. books) is defined around sequential reading and writing, whereas hypertext offers the possibility of non-sequential reading and writing. Do you totally agree?

 

What is understood under the “post-structural literary criticism”?

 

What could be criticized about the post-structuralism?

 

On page 30 it is stated that “the principle of hypertext is key to understanding new media”. Why?

 

What are the differences of “mass media” and “new media”?  

 

Where does the desire for developments such as cyberspace lie?

 

What goals or purposes might attract the financial investment necessary for such technological developments?

 

In what way are experiences of self and identity mediated in a ‚virtual‘ space?

 

 

 

Feel free to comment on our draft and questions!

 

To the feedback group: Armin and I (Anina) are going to meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 12 at the 'Liegewiese' to comment on the draft and questions.Please drop by if you find the time or post some of your ideas on this page as well!!!CU!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (16)

DerArmin said

at 2:31 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.1
Hard to comprehend and understand if one has not written it him or herself.
Yet, very detailed, which is good. Still, one might argue that it is too much into detail. One key-statement in sentence-form would have been easier to comprehend. (e.g. Media, as an institution, refers to two things. One: it refers to communication media and …; Two: it refers to the cultural and material products from “one” such as …..)
The statement on “new=good” can be misunderstood as the author’s own opinion. Yet, the author does not say so. He only discusses the positive connotation of “new” that does not necessarily reflect his opinion as he requests the reader to critically analyze “new” media.
It took us some time to figure that each of your sub points in 1.1 actually referred to the corresponding subchapter. Maybe, it would have improved understanding if you would have made that more clear (as you later did for the following chapters). Anyway, after understanding you outline we found your brief and complete summaries appealing.

DerArmin said

at 2:31 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2
Well done

DerArmin said

at 2:31 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.1
Your point on digital representation in numbers is wrong (page 15, 2nd last sentence)
Everything else in this chapter: well done

DerArmin said

at 2:32 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.2
Point one ambiguous, can be misunderstood as definition of interactivity, yet, is definition of instrumental interactivity.
We found it difficult to comprehend the main claims of Lister on Interactivity by the headlines of his subchapters.

DerArmin said

at 2:32 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.3
Wikipedia, or in fact this Wiki, are good examples to visualize the theoretical approach of the text (will you be more specific in what regards Wikipedia is hypertext?)
Will you refer to the difference of “linear and multi-linear” and introduce hypermediacy?
Well done summarizing and not just quoting headlines.

DerArmin said

at 2:32 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.4
Well done
Examples on “consumption” and aspects of “production” , similar to what you have done on one aspect of “production” would have helped comprehension. Yet, that’s only peanuts.

DerArmin said

at 2:32 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.5
All right,
Still, we found it hard to follow the structure of your summary. We have read the text, of course, and your points are correct. Yet, it was slightly difficult for us to find the aspects in the text that you referred to. We would have appreciated a more detailed look on the two aspects of VR (maybe an example for each?) You did do the chapter 1.2.6, didn’t you. Your headline was slightly misleading for us.

DerArmin said

at 2:33 pm on Nov 20, 2007

1.2.7
Over all, well done.
We were missing aspects of cyberspace, even though there were traces in your 1.2.5
Will we discuss the questions the author brought up about the future of cyberspace?

DerArmin said

at 2:33 pm on Nov 20, 2007

Overall evaluation:
We found your work content wise appealing. You presented the key arguments from the text mostly correct. Yet, we found your way of presenting them rather difficult to comprehend and incoherent. While some chapter summaries were briefly rewritten in your own word and in sentences, other chapters’ summaries were rather hard to understand.
We missed an overall conclusion (which is just very minor criticism, but that is what we are supposed to do; after all we are the feedback group). We hope that we will have opportunities to apply the knowledge gained in lively and praxis-orientated discussions in class.
As the final words are those remembered: well done.

DerArmin said

at 9:47 pm on Nov 20, 2007

By the way, the comment was posted by Anina, Kirsten and Armin

profile picture

Steffen said

at 12:02 pm on Nov 21, 2007

Overall evaluation: We think you did a good job on summarizing and filtering the key facts of this rather large and detailed text. We also think that your key facts are formulated correctly. However, regarding the layout we think that you could have chosen a better structure. We don't see the point in adopting the numbering from the source text, for us it is a bit confusing. But that is just minor criticism. Another point of (minor) criticism is that you are missing some aspects of the text, e.g. the sections 1.2.6 (Which virtual reality) and parts of 1.2.7 (regarding the topic cyberspace). We also think that an overall conclusion at the end would have been a good way to summarize your really well-done entry.

profile picture

Steffen said

at 12:09 pm on Nov 21, 2007

feedback to 1.1 What are new media?:
Overall good job. We think that you could have put more emphasis on the ideological aspect regarding your third point (new=better), namely that "enthusiasm for the latest thing is rarely if ever ideologically neutral".

profile picture

Steffen said

at 1:16 pm on Nov 21, 2007

1.2:overall well done!
1.2.1: why did you take out your point that all input data in digital media is converted into numbers?
1.2.2: To better understand your first point we think you could have added an overall explanation of what is meant by "an opportunity to manipulate and intervene in media" (e.g. the changing of images and texts by users). By doing this ambiguity can be avoided.
In addition to just listing the examples for interactivity, we would have found one sentence or some key words for each example helpful.
1.2.3: good job on getting across the main aspects of this difficult chapter! In our point of view we think that you could have added Vannevar Bush's interesting position stating that "associative linkage of data"(as in hypertext)"is a more natural model of information management than the conventional linear alphabetical methods" therefore opening new ways e.g. in the process of acquiring new information.
We also think that you could have explained your quotation about cybertextuality.
1.2.4: good!
We might have found it useful if you shortly explained why the distinction between producer and consumer has broken down or if there is a complete break between old and new media.

profile picture

Marc said

at 10:48 am on Nov 22, 2007

1.2.5 Virtuality: Good job. We like the way you summarized the difficult chapter. However we think that you could have drawn a distiction between "virtuality" and "virtual reality". The author of the text puts a lot of emphasis on this.
One of your quotes is very interesting: "...discussions of the internet and the world wide web...". What is the difference between the internet and the world wide web? That would be a great question for a discussion in class.

profile picture

Marc said

at 10:59 am on Nov 22, 2007

1.2.7 Future Scenarios: The chapter about the future of cyberspace is very interesting. Your summary of the chapter is good, but we think that you could have expanded on the topic a little bit more. The text is from 2003. Therefore it would be interesting to discuss in what way the predictions of the author have already come to pass. (e.g. Web 2.0; Second Life)

profile picture

Marc said

at 11:01 am on Nov 22, 2007

by the way: those last five comments were posted by Marc and Steffen

You don't have permission to comment on this page.